whistleblower-protection.org
  • Home
  • ⚖️ Legal Gaps – Japan’s Whistleblower Law
  • 🟦 Infroneer Non-Compliance
  • 🟩 Government Non-Compliance
  • 🟫 Media Non-Compliance
  • 🟪 Finance Non-Compliance
  • 🟥 Japan NCP Non-Performance
  • 🟦 U.S. NCP Non-Performance
  • 📘 Evidence Timeline
whistleblower-protection.org

Home

⚖️ Legal Gaps – Japan’s Whistleblower Law

🟦 Infroneer Non-Compliance

🟩 Government Non-Compliance

🟫 Media Non-Compliance

🟪 Finance Non-Compliance

🟥 Japan NCP Non-Performance

🟦 U.S. NCP Non-Performance

📘 Evidence Timeline

Evidence No.18
Evidence No.18

Evidence No.18

[Maeda Corporation Compliance Hotline (Identified Report)] Inquiry Received

Date/Time: April 10, 2025, 10:25

From: Shunsuke Kimura shukku9998@gmail.com

To: Whistleblower Protection Office g.koueki24@caa.go.jp

To: Consumer Affairs Agency

Office of the Director (Whistleblower Protection and Cooperation)

Dear Sir/Madam,

This is Shunsuke Kimura.

Thank you very much for your reply by email.

Following your message dated March 28, 2025 (Reiwa 7), I have read the latest guidance you provided today and have formally acknowledged your intention to examine whether there is a violation concerning the “internal system development obligation” under Article 11 of the Whistleblower Protection Act.

In this case, the issue extends beyond my individual damages and is instead about a continuing lack of systems, silence, and non-response across the entire corporate group.

I recognize that this matter fundamentally calls into question the very existence of the whistleblower system itself.

If I receive any response from the company side, I will promptly provide the content to your office as supplementary information.

Thank you for your continued attention and handling of this matter.

Sincerely,

Shunsuke Kimura

April 10, 2025 (Thursday), 9:59

Whistleblower Protection Office g.koueki24@caa.go.jp

📘 OECD/UNCAC Legal Reference

OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises

  • Chapter II (General Policies): Paragraphs 2 and 11 – Establishing effective systems to prevent and remedy adverse impacts
  • Chapter IV (Human Rights): Paragraphs 1 and 4 – Avoiding negative human rights impacts and protecting whistleblowers

UNCAC Article 33

  • Protection of reporting persons from unjustified treatment

📎 The original Japanese evidence document (PDF) is attached below for reference.

Date
2025/04/10 10:25 AM (GMT+9)
icon
Stakeholder Tag

🟩 Consumer Affairs Agency

icon
Summary

In response, the whistleblower acknowledged the agency’s position but emphasized that the case illustrates a structural and systemic failure. Specifically, the whistleblower asserted that the mere existence of a compliance system—without any ability to intervene in retaliatory actions or ensure real protection—represents a violation of both domestic legal obligations and the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises.

Title

Formal Acknowledgment – Request for Oversight Due to Compliance Collapse