whistleblower-protection.org
  • Home
  • ⚖️ Legal Gaps – Japan’s Whistleblower Law
  • 🟦 Infroneer Non-Compliance
  • 🟩 Government Non-Compliance
  • 🟫 Media Non-Compliance
  • 🟪 Finance Non-Compliance
  • 🟥 Japan NCP Non-Performance
  • 🟦 U.S. NCP Non-Performance
  • 📘 Evidence Timeline
whistleblower-protection.org

Home

⚖️ Legal Gaps – Japan’s Whistleblower Law

🟦 Infroneer Non-Compliance

🟩 Government Non-Compliance

🟫 Media Non-Compliance

🟪 Finance Non-Compliance

🟥 Japan NCP Non-Performance

🟦 U.S. NCP Non-Performance

📘 Evidence Timeline

Evidence No.17
Evidence No.17

Evidence No.17

[Maeda Corporation Compliance Hotline (Identified Report)] Inquiry Received

Date/Time: April 10, 2025, 9:59

From: Whistleblower Protection Office g.koueki24@caa.go.jp

To: Shunsuke Kimura shukku9998@gmail.com

Dear Whistleblower,

Thank you for your continued correspondence.

As stated in our email dated March 28, 2025 (Reiwa 7), our Agency will confirm whether there is any violation concerning the “internal system development” required of the business operator.

Please be advised that we do not have the authority to investigate or ascertain the “operational realities” of individual cases.

■ Consumer Affairs Agency

Office of the Director (Whistleblower Protection and Cooperation)

3-1-1 Kasumigaseki, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 100-8958

Central Government Building No.4, 6th Floor

Email: g.koueki24@caa.go.jp

📘 OECD/UNCAC Legal Reference

OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises

  • Chapter II (General Policies): Enterprises must develop effective internal systems to support ethical conduct and compliance.
  • Chapter IV (Human Rights): Retaliation against whistleblowers can constitute adverse human rights impact.

OECD Anti-Bribery Recommendation (2009)

  • Annex II: Recommends enterprises establish internal reporting mechanisms with integrity and confidentiality.

UNCAC Article 33

  • Encourages State Parties to provide protection against unjustified treatment for whistleblowers who report in good faith.

📎 The original Japanese evidence document (PDF) is attached below for reference.

Date
2025/04/10 9:59 AM (GMT+9)
icon
Stakeholder Tag

🟩 Consumer Affairs Agency

icon
Summary

The agency later reiterated that its role is limited to verifying the presence of a whistleblowing mechanism and does not extend to evaluating the actual operation, fairness, or effectiveness of such systems. This clarification underlined the narrow procedural focus of Japan’s administrative approach.

Title

CAA Limitation – No Authority to Investigate Real-World Practice